Since the first spacecraft explored the Jovian system in the late 1970s, scientists have recognized that Jupiter's large moons display strikingly different characteristics, with Io and Europa providing the most pronounced example. Io is a dry, intensely volcanic world, whereas Europa is ice-covered and widely believed to conceal a deep subsurface ocean of liquid water.

"Io and Europa are next-door neighbors orbiting Jupiter, yet they look like they come from completely different families," said Southwest Research Institute scientist Olivier Mousis, second author of the new study published in The Astrophysical Journal. "Our study shows that this contrast was not written over time; it was already there at birth."

The team examined two leading hypotheses to explain the divergent water inventories of Io and Europa. One scenario proposed that extreme conditions close to Jupiter during satellite formation prevented water ice from surviving, leaving Io intrinsically deprived of water. The other suggested that Io and Europa initially formed with similar water contents, but that Io later lost most of its volatiles through atmospheric escape and surface erosion over billions of years.

To test these ideas, the researchers reconstructed the earliest evolutionary stages of Io and Europa, assuming that their water originated in hydrated minerals incorporated during formation. They used an advanced numerical modeling framework that couples the moons' internal thermal evolution with volatile escape processes, including all major heat sources active in the young Jovian system such as accretional heating, radioactive decay, tidal dissipation and Jupiter's intense radiation environment.

"Io has long been seen as a moon that lost its water later in life," Mousis said. "But when we put that idea to the test, the physics just refuses to cooperate: Io simply cannot get rid of its water that efficiently." The same modeling shows that Europa would also retain its water even under extreme conditions, contradicting the notion that subsequent evolution alone sculpted their different compositions.

The results indicate that Io and Europa were already fundamentally different at birth, with Io assembling from dry materials and Europa accreting from ice-rich building blocks. "The simplest explanation turns out to be the right one," Mousis said. "Io was born dry, Europa was born wet, and no amount of late-stage evolution can change that."

According to the study, the compositional contrast between Io and Europa is therefore not the outcome of long-term volatile loss, but a direct legacy of the primordial environment in Jupiter's circumplanetary disk when its moons formed. Within that disk, hydrated materials destined for Europa remained water-rich, while similar materials crossing an inner dehydration line before reaching Io dried out and produced an intrinsically arid moon.

These conclusions challenge the long-standing assumption that Io's high density reflects massive volatile loss after formation. Instead, they point to spatial variations in temperature and chemistry within the disk around young Jupiter as the key factor in setting the initial water budgets of its large moons.

Upcoming missions will provide critical tests of this new picture. Beginning in 2031, NASA's Europa Clipper mission and the European Space Agency's Juice mission will explore Jupiter's large moons in detail, examining their interiors, surfaces and space environments. By probing plume activity and the isotopic fingerprints of water in material erupting from fractures in Europa's icy shell, these spacecraft are expected to offer powerful clues to the early conditions of Jovian moon formation and further refine models of how Io and Europa diverged as primordial ocean worlds.

Research Report:On the Divergent Evolution of Io and Europa as Primordial Ocean Worlds

Related Links
Southwest Research Institute
The million outer planets of a star called Sol