
Copernical Team
MIT engineers find a way to protect microbes from extreme conditions

Ariane 6 the day before launch

Nearby Exoplanet Found with Hydrogen Sulfide Atmosphere

SpaceX Successfully Launches Turkey's First Home-Grown Communications Satellite

Subaru Telescope Discovers New Objects Beyond the Kuiper Belt

Martian Atmosphere Unveiled Through Innovative Use of Existing Technology

Orion and SLS Gearing Up for Major Artemis Missions

Artemis IV Set to Launch with Modernized RS-25 Engines

Germany's Integral Role in the Ariane 6 Launch Program

CubeSat propulsion technologies are taking off

CubeSats are becoming ever more popular, with about 2,400 total launched so far. However, the small size limits their options for fundamental space exploration technologies, including propulsion. They become even more critical when mission planners design missions that require them to travel to other planets or even asteroids.
A team from Khalifa University of Science and Technology in Abu Dhabi recently released a review in Aerospace of the different CubeSat propulsion technologies currently available—let's look at their advantages and disadvantages.
The paper breaks propulsion systems into four categories: Chemical, Kinetic, Electrical, and "Propellant-less." Chemical systems are the traditional rockets most people think of when launching satellites—they burn chemicals together and expel gas created by the fire to produce thrust. Kinetic systems use things like cold gas, where instead of reacting two chemicals together, they simply push gas molecules out to propel themselves in the opposite direction.